Centre for Research on Globalisation
Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation


A process of slow and hidden transfer is being carried out in the West Bank today


Behind the Smokescreen on the Gaza Pullout

by Tanya Reinhart

Yediot Aharonot, 13 April 2005, Translated from Hebrew by Mark Marshall
www.globalresearch.ca 10 April 2005

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/REI504C.html

Sharon traveled to the USA as a hero of peace, as if he had already evacuated Gaza and only the follow-up remained to be worked out. 

What has completely disappeared from the public agenda is what is happening meanwhile in the West Bank. The media continue to deluge us daily with disengagement storms, like the Nitzanim bubble. But for now the disengagement the Gaza pullout - exists only on paper. 

On the ground, no settler has yet received compensation. Even those who agreed to accept compensation are now waiting, because if they have a chance to get Nitzanim - the pearl of Israeli real estate - why hurry? 

In the meantime, three and a half months before the projected date of evacuation, it is still not clear where the evacuees will be housed until the discussions regarding their final relocation destination are concluded. Contrary to the prevailing impression, no infrastructure has been set up even for their temporary dwellings. “The Settlement Department of the Jewish Agency, responsible for providing the ‘caravillas’[the caravans that were supposed to host the evacuated settlers temporarily] has so far received no order from the government”. (Petersburg, “Yediot Ahronot”, 8 April 2005)

If Sharon intends to evacuate the Gaza settlements, he is doing so with outrageous inefficiency. He is far more efficient in the West Bank. There, plans are carried out precisely as scheduled. Right from the start, during the first agreements between Sharon and Netanyahu one year ago about the disengagement plan, it was agreed that the disengagement would not be put into effect before the “separation fence” was completed on the western side of the West Bank(1). Indeed, the construction of the wall is moving towards completion. 

In July the announced date for the beginning of the Gaza evacuation the wall surrounding East Jerusalem and cutting it off from the West Bank will be in place. The Palestinians who live there will be able to leave only with permits. 

The center of life in the West Bank will become an enclosed prison. As well, the northern wall, which has already imprisoned the residents of Tul Karem, Qalqilya and Mas’ha, and which has robbed them of their lands, continues to advance southwards. Now the bulldozers are headed for the lands of Bil’in and Safa, bordering the settlements of Modi’in Elit. The farmers who are losing their lands are trying to stand their ground, together with Israeli opponents of the wall. But who would hear about their sufferings and about their struggle, amid the tumult over the disengagement?

The disengagement plan was born in February 2004, at the height of a wave of international criticism over the wall project, on the eve of the opening of deliberations at the international court in The Hague. In the ruling that was handed down in July, the court determined that the route of the wall was a blatant and serious violation of international law. Moreover, the court indicated that there was a danger of “a further change in the demographic composition as a result of the departure of the Palestinian population from certain areas” (para. 122). In other words, the court warned of a process of transfer.

According to UN data 237,000 Palestinians will be trapped between the wall and the Green Line and 160,000 others will remain on the Palestinian side, cut off from their land. (The route that was approved at the government’s meeting in February 2005 reduces their number only slightly) (2). What is to be expected for those people, for the farmers who lose their land, for the imprisoned who are cut off from their families and their livelihoods? In the ghost towns of Tul Karem and Qualqilya and the villages around Mas’ha, many have already left in order to seek subsistence on the edges of towns in the centre of the West Bank. How much longer will the others be able to hold on under conditions of despair and atrophy, inside villages which have become prisons?

“Transfer” is associated in the collective memory with trucks arriving at night to take Palestinians across the border, as occurred in some places in 1948. But behind the smoke screen of disengagement, a process of slow and hidden transfer is being carried out in the West Bank today. It is not easy to judge which method of “transferring” people from their land is crueler. Nearly 400,000 people, about half the number of Palestinians who were forced to leave their land in 1948, are now candidates for “voluntary emigration” to refugee camps in the West Bank. And all this is currently being passed over in silence because maybe Sharon will disengage.

(1) Here, e.g. are some reports from April last year: “The prime minister took a commitment that the separation fence will be completed before evacuation starts... Security echelons estimate that the fence can be completed at the earliest towards the end of 2005. In other words: It is possible that Israel will not be able to complete the evacuation at the date that was promised to the U.S.” (Yosi Yehushua, Yediot Aharonot, April 19, 2004). “Netanyahu announced that he intends to support the disengagement after the three conditions he posed were met …[including] completion of the fence before the evacuation” (Itamar Eichner and Nehama Duek, Yediot Aharonot, April 19, 2004).

(2) The figures are from the ICJ advisory opinion of July 9 that can be found at http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idocket/imwp/imwpframe.htm . Similar figures were given in the Israeli media, e.g.Meron Rappaport, Yediot Aharonot, May 23, 2003; Akiva Eldar, Ha'aretz, February 16, 2004. The new line of the barrier as approved by the Israeli cabinet in February 20, 2005 reduces the size of Palestinian land to be annexed by the barrier by 2.5%, mainly in the Southern Hebron area, where work is only starting (so the barrier route can still change many times, as the work progresses). There were smaller adjustments in other areas, dictated by decisions of the Israeli Supreme Court, which means that some of the encircled villages should get some of their land back. But this does not effect the total number of Palestinians encircled by the wall. In Khirbet Jbara in the Tulkarm Governorate, the cabinet approved moving a 6km section of the Barrier closer to the Green Line. As a result, the Palestinian population in this area will no longer be located in a completely closed area, but rather on the West Bank side of the Barrier. This will reduce the overall Palestinian population completely isolated from the West Bank by about 340 persons (according to UN OCHA report of March 2005 on the preliminary analysis of the effects of the new wall route approved in February 2005. www.ochaopt.org )



Email this article to a friend

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article must be indicated. The author's copyright note must be displayed.  For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: [email protected]



return to home page