Centre for Research on Globalisation
Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation




  August 2004
www.globalresearch.ca    August 2004

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/408A.html

     In October 2000, the congresman Denis J. Kucinich introduced in the American
Congress a bill, obliging the American president to get engaged in the negotiations aimed
at the ban of space based weapons. In this bill the definition of a weapon system includes: 
„any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting death or injury on, or
damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or
physical and economic well-being of a person)… through the use of land-based, sea-
based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic,
laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the
purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or
populations“(15). As in all legislative acts quoted in this article the bill counts with
sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation of human brain. Psychotronic weapons
remain, at least for a layman uninformed of secret military research, in the sphere of
science fiction, since so far none of the published scientific experiments was presented in
the way which would allow for its replication.

     That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with the use of subliminal, either
sound or visual, messages is now generally known. This is why in most of the countries
the use of such technologies, without consent of the user, is baned. Devices using light for
the stimulation of the brain show another way how the light flashing in certain
frequencies could be used for the manipulation of human psychic life. As for the sound, a
report on the device transmitting a beam of sound waves, which can hear only  persons at
whom the beam of sound waves is targeted, has appeared in the world newspapers. The
beam is formed by a combination of sound and ultrasound waves which causes that a
person targeted by this beam hears the sound inside of his head. Such a perception could
easily convince the human being that it is mentally ill. The facts presented in this article  
suggest that with the development of technology and knowledge of the functioning of
human brain new ways of manipulation of human mind keep emerging. One of them
seems to be the electromagnetic energy.

     Though in the open scientific literature only some 30 experiments were published,
supporting this assumption (1),(2), already in 1974, in the USSR, after succesfull testing
with military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered
with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the
USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves (3), (4), (5).
In the scientific literature technical feasibility of making a human being asleep by radio
waves is confirmed in the book by English scientist carrying out research on the
biological effects of electromagnetism  (6). In the report by World Health Association on
nonionizing radiation from 1991 we read "Many of biological effects observed in animals
exposed to ELF fields appear to be associated, either directly or indirectly, with the
nervous system…" (2).

Among the published experiments there are experiments where
pulsed microwaves caused the synchronization of isolated neurons with the frequency of
pulsing of microwaves - for example a neuron firing at a frequency 0.8 Hz was forced in
this way to fire the impulses at a frequency of 1 Hz. As well pulsed microwaves changed
the concentration of neurotransmitters in brain (neurotransmitters are a part of the
mechanism which causes the firing of neurons in the brain) and reinforced or attenuated
the effects of drugs delivered into the brain (1). The experiment where the main brain
frequencies registered by EEG were synchronized with the frequency of microwave
pulsing (1,2) might explain the function of the Russian installation Radioson. Microwaves
pulsed in the sleep frequency would cause the synchronization of the brain activity with
the sleep frequency and in this way produce the sleep. Pulsing of microwaves in 
frequency predominating in the brain at awaked state could by the same procedure deny
the sleep to a human being. A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave
Research Department at the Walter Read Army Institute of research states "Microwave
pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to
electric stimulation unrelated to heat". In a many times replicated experiment microwaves
pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the nerve cells (1,2).
Calcium plays a key role in the firing of neurons and Ross Adey, member of the first
scientific team which published this experiment, publically expressed his conviction that
this effect of electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration on complex
tasks (7).

Robert Becker, who had share in the discovery of the effect of pulsed fields at
the healing of broken bones, published the excerpts  from the report from Walter Reed
Army Institute testing program. In the first part "prompt debilitation effects" should have
been tested (8). Were not those effects based on the experiment by Ross Adey and others
with calcium efflux? British scientist John Evans, working in the same field, wrote that
both Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their positions and research grants and called
them "free-thinking exiles" (6). In 1975, in the USA, a military experiment was published
where pulsed microwaves produced, in the brain of a human subject, an audio perception
of numbers from 1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince human being that it is
menatlly ill is obvious.  The testing program of American Walter Read Army Institute of
Research, where the experiment took place, counts with "prompt auditory stimulation by
means of auditory effects" and finally aims at  "behavior controled by stimulation" (8). 
Let us imagine that the words delivered into the brain were transcribed into ultrasound
frequencies. Would not then the subject perceive those words as his own thoughts? And
could not then his behavior be controled in this way? The American Air Force 1982
"Final Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical Systems
Through the Year 2000" states: "While initial attention should be toward degradation of
human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects,
subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental
functioning, using externally applied fields…" (10).

      Several scientists warned that latest advances in neurophysiology could be used for
the manipulation of human brain. In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the
American Navy's project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons, published, in a
scientific magazine, an article where he states:  „the technical capability to influence
directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species
without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural information
within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed… is
now marginally feasible“ (11). In 1998, the French National Bioethics Committee warned
that  „neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing potential threat to human
rights“ (12). In May 1999 the neuroscientists conference, sponsored by the UN, took
place in Tokyo. In the declaration we read: "Today we have intellectual, physical and
financial resources to master the power of the brain itself, and to develop devices to touch
the mind and even control or erase consciousness…We wish to profess our hope that such
pursuit of knowledge serves peace and welfare" (13).

     The events at the international political scene, in the last few years, confirm that the
concept of remote control of human brain is a matter of negotiations. In January 1999 the
European Parliament passed a resolution where it „calls for an international convention
introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings.“ (14)

     Already in 1997 nine states of the Union of Independent States addressed OUN, OBSE
and the states of the Interparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at the agenda of
the General Assembly of the Organization of United Nations  the preparation  and
conclusion of an international convention „On Prevention of Informational Wars and
Limitation of Circulation of Informational Weapons“ (16), (3).

     The initiative was originaly proposed, in the Russian State Duma, by Vladimir Lopatin
(3). V. Lopatin worked, from 1990 to 1995, in sequence, in the Committees on Security
of the Russian Federation, Russian  State Duma and Interparliamentary Assembly of the
Commonwealth of Independent States, specializing in informational security (3). The
concept of informational weapon or informational war is rather unknown to the world
general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together with Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov,
published a book „Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia“ (3). There we find
the explanation of this terminology: "In the report on the research of the American
Physical Society for the year 1993 the conclusion is presented that psychophysical
weapon systems…can be used… for the construction of a strategic arm of a new type
(informational weapon in informational war)…" Among many references to this subject
we find Materials of the Parliament Hearings "Threats and Challenges in the Sphere of
Informational Security", Moscow, July 1996, "Informational Weapon as a Threat to the
National Security of the Russian Federation" (analytical report of the Intelligence Service
of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 1996 and a material "To Whom Will Belong the
Conscienscious Weapon in the 21st century", Moscow, 1997. (17). In 2000 V. Lopatin
introduced, after two other authors, the third in order bill on the subject of "Informational
and Psychological Security of the Russian Federation“.  The Russian newspaper
Segodnya wrote about this draft: „…means of informational-psychological influence are
capable not only to harm the health of a person, but, as well, cause – and quotation of
Lopatin‘s draft follows – „the blocking of freedom of will of human being on subliminal
level, the loss of ability of political, cultural and other selfidentifiction of human being,
the manipulation of societal consciousness“ and even „destruction of united informational
and spiritual space of Russia“ (16).

     In the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia" the authors propose
among the basic principles of the Russian concept of the defense against the remote
control of human psyche the acknowledgement of its factual existence as well as the 
acknowledgement of „realistic feasibility of informational, psychotronic war (which as a
matter of fact is actually taking place without declaration of war)“ (18). They quote as
well the record from the session of the Russian Federation Federal Council where V.
Lopatin stated that psychotronic weapon can "cause the blocking of the freedom of will of
a human being on a subliminal level" or "instillation into the consciousness or
subconsciousness of a human being of information which will cause faulty perception of
the reality" (19).  For that matter they propose the preparation of national legislative as
well as the norms of international law "aimed at the defense of human psyche against
subliminal, destructive, informational effects" (20). As well they propose the
declassificcation of all works on this technology and warn that, as a consequence of the
classification, the arms race is speeding up making the psychotronic war probable.
Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche they list the
„generators of physical fields“ of  "known as well as unknown nature" (21).

     In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the
Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published the report on
Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation in British
Manchester (22). One of four major subjects of the study are the „2nd generation“ or "non
lethal" technologies: "This report evaluates the second generation of 'non-lethal' weapons
which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the
United States as part of the Clinton Administration's 'non-lethal' warfare doctrine now
adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed energy
beam,…radio frequency, laser and accoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets"
(23)  The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘ crowd control …
technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy
Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest concern is with
systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system“ (24). The report also
states that „perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in secrecy“ (25).
The unavailability of offical documents confirming the existence of this technology may
be the reason why the OMEGA report is referencing, with respect to mind control
technology, the internet publication of the author of this article  (26). In an identical
approach the internet publication of the directrice of the American  human rights and anti
mind control organization (CAHRA), Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by joint initiative of
Quaker United Nations Office, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, and
Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, with respect to non-lethal
weapons (27).

     On September 25th, 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma
discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the Federal law On Weapons. In the resolution
we read: „The achievements of contemporary science… allow for creation of measured
methods of secret, remote influencing on the psyches and physiology of a person or  a
group of people“ (28). The committee recommended that the addendum be approved.
     The addendum to the article 6 of the Russian Federation law „On Weapons“was
approved on July 26, 2001. It states: „ within the territory of the Russian Federation is
prohibited the circulation of weapons and other  objects… the effects of the operation  of
which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic
radiations…“ (29). In this way the Russian government made a first step to stand up to its
dedication to the ban of mind control technology.

     In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation, signed by
president Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening the informational
security of Russian Federation, is listed „the threat to the constitutional rights and
freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life… individual, group and
societal consciousness“ and "illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and
societal consciousness" (30). Among the major directions of the international cooperation
toward the guaranteeing of the informational security is listed „the ban of production,
dissemination and use of 'informational weapon‘  “ (31). This should be interpreted as the
continuing Russian dedication to the international ban of the means of remote influencing 
of the activity of human brain.
     In the above mentioned report, published by the STOA, the  originally proposed
version of the resolution of the European Parliament is quoted, calling for „an 
international convention for a global ban on all research and development… which seeks
to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the
human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of
human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such
systems.“(32) Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are already
     Among the countries with the most advanced military technologies those are the USA
which did not present any international initiative demanding the ban of technologies
enabling the remote control of human mind. (The original version of the bill by Denis J.
Kucinich was changed.) All the same, according to the study published  by STOA, the
USA are the major promoter  of the use of those arms. Non lethal technology was
included into NATO military doctrine due to their effort: "At the initiative of the USA,
within the framework of NATO, a special group was formed, for the perspective use of
devices of non-lethal effects" states the record from the session of the Committe on
Security of the Russian State Duma (28). The report published by STOA states: "In
October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in
allied arsenals" (33). "In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included…
directed energy systems" and "radio frequency weapons" (34) - those weapons, as was
suggested in the STOA report as well, are being associated with the effects on human
nervous system. According to the Russian government informational agency FAPSI, in
the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of the means of
informational war grew four times and at present time they occupy the first place among
all military programs (17),(3).Though there are other concepts of informational war than
mind control,  the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations aimed at the ban
of the manipulation of human brains might indicate their intent to use those means in
internal as well as international affairs. One clear consequence of the  continuation of the
apparent politics of secrecy surrounding  technologies enabling remote control of human
brains might be that the governments, who would own such technologies, could use them
without having to take into consideration the opinion of the  general public. The concept
of the democratic world thus would be, though secretly,  disrupted in this way, and in the
future the world populations could live in only fake democracy where their own or
foreign governments might, by means of secret technologies, shape their opinions.

         Mojmir Babacek
(the author is the founder of the International Movement for the Ban of the Manipulation
of Human Nervous System by  Technical Means
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm )

1) Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromadnetic Fields, 1996, CRC Press Inc.,
0-8493-0641-8/96, -  pg. 117, 119, 474- 485, 542-551, 565 at the top and third and
last paragraph
2) World Health Organization report on non-ionizing radiation from 1991, pg. 143
and 207-208
3) V. Lopatin, V Cygankov: „Psichotronnoje oružie i bezopasnost Rossii“, SINTEG,
Russian Federation,  Moscow, ISBN 5-89638-006-2-A5-2000-30, list of the
publications of the publishing house you will find at the address
4)  G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov: „Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k realijam“, Russsian
Federation,  Moscow, „Mysteries“, 1993, ISBN 5-86422-098-1
5) With greatest likelihood as well the Russian daily TRUD, which has organized the
search for the documents, Moscow, between August 1991 and  end of 1992
6) John Evans: Mind, Body and  Electromagnetism, the Burlington Press, Cambridge,
1992, ISBN 1874498008, str.139
7) Robert Becker: "Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life",
William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985, pg. 287 
8) Robert Becker: "Cross Currents, teh Startling Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation
on your Health", 1991, Bloomsburry Publishing, London, Great Brittain, ISBN 0-
7475-0761-9, pg. 304, Robert Becker refers to Bioelectromagnetics Society
Newsletter, January and February 1989
9) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March
1975, pg. 391 - 401
10) Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Maning: "Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Advances in
Tesla Technology", Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN 0-9648812--0-9, pg. 169
11) M. A. Persinger: „On the Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every Human Brain by
Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms“, Perception and Motor
Skills, June1995,, sv. 80, str. 791-799
12) Nature, vol.391, 22.1.1998,str.316, „Advances in Neurosciences May Threaten
Human Rights“
13) Internet reference at the site of the United Nations University and Institute of
Advanced Studies in Tokyo does not work any more, to verify the information it is
necessary to find the document from the 1999 UN sponsored conference of
neuroscientists in Tokyo, you may inquire at the address [email protected]
14) http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1 click at Plenary
sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number –click, choose 1999 and fill in 005
to  A4  or search for Resolution on the environment, security and foreign policy
from January 28, 1999
15) http://thomas.loc.gov./ and search for Space Preservation Act then click at 
16) Russian daily Segodnya,  11. February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov: „Vsadniki
psychotronitscheskovo apokalypsa" (Riders of Psychotronic Apokalypse)
17) See ref. 3), pg. 107
18) See ref. 3) pg. 97
19) See ref. 3), pg. 107
20) See ref. 3), pg. 108
21) See ref. 3) pg. 13
22) http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
23) see ref. 22 pg. XIX or 25
24) see ref. 22 pg. LIII or 69
25) see ref. 22 pg. XLVII or 63, aswell pg. VII-VIII or 7-8, pg. XIX or 25, pg. XLV or
26) see ref. 22) pg. LIII or 69, note 354
27) http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide%20    CAHRA and Cheryl Welsh are
listed at the page 24
28) Document sent by Moscow Committee of Ecology of Dwellings.  Telephone:
Russian Federation, Zelenograd, 531-6411, Emilia Tschirkova, directrice
29) Search  www.rambler.ru , there "poisk" (search) and search for "gosudarstvennaja
duma" (State Duma) (it is necessary to type in Russian alphabet), at the page which
appears choose "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy" (Informational
Channel of the Russian State Duma), there "federalnyje zakony podpisanyje
prezidentom RF" (Federal laws signed by president of the Russian Federation), 
choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, č. N 103-F3 (July 26, 2001, number N 103-
F3) , "O vnesenii dopolnenija v statju 6 federalnogo zakona ob oružii"   (addendum
to the article 6 of   the Federal law on weapons)
30) Search www.rambler.ru and then (type in Russian alphabet) "gosudarstvennaja
duma", next "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy" (informational channel
of the State Duma), next search by use of "poisk" (search) Doktrina informacionnoj
bezopasnosti Rossii" "Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian
Federation) there see pg. 3 "Vidy informacionnych ugroz bezopasnosti Rossijskkoj
federacii" (Types of Threats to the Informational Security of the Russian
31) See ref. 30, pg. 19,  "Měždunarodnoje sotrudničestvo Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti
obespečenija informacionnoj bezopasnoti" (International Cooperation of the
Russian Federation in Assuring the Informational Security"
32) See ref.22, pg. XVII or 33
33) See ref.22, pg. XLV or 61
34) See ref.22 pg. XLVI or 62

     "20 years ago, when we started working on microwave therapy, we made an
agreement that the discoveries in this area we will never use to the detriment of
people. The warning of general Kobets, that OMON (Russian antiterrorist police)
has got psychotronic weapon goes to prove that the psychotronic weapon has been
already produced. If it finds a way into the hands of people with bad intentions, it
may be more dangerous than nuclear bomb, since it is capable to stifle the free
will of a human being. We address president Yeltsine and democratic
organisations of the world with a demand that the use of psychotronic generators
in quality of weapons is baned."
     This call of several heads of Russian research institutes, universities and
medical institutions was published by Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda in
June 6, 1992. Together with this information the daily published the results of the
measurement of densities of radiofrequency radiation  in 10 appartments in
Moscow, where the families complained that their psychic activity and physical
shape are being manipulated by electromagnetic radiation. In all ten appartments
intensive, directed electromagnetic radiation was found.
     When in 1991 Komsomoskaya Pravda published the story of a former
lieutenant colonel of the Soviet KGB, who complained of the same problems, the
newspaper received more than 400 letters from people with similar experiences.
Since out of ten above mentioned families only one wrote a letter there is a strong
possibility that there are perhaps ten times more such people in Russia.
     Cheryl Welsh, the directrice of an American organisation engaged in the
defence of people complaining of manipulation of their nervous system by
technical means, claims that she has received more than 1000 letters describing
such experiences and asking for help.
     Since the begining of this year, in the state Michigan in the USA, is in effect a
law according to which any person producing, delivering, possesing, transporting
or using harmfull elctronic or electromagnetic device may be sentenced up to 15
years in prison. The same punishmnent is defined in the law for biological,
chemical and radioactive weapons ( http://www.michiganlegislature.org/documents/2003 -
2004/publicact/htm/2003-PA-0256.htm ). Is there not in place a question whether the
U.S. government does not own electronic and electromagnetic weapons of mass
destruction? In the year 2002 the Russian State Duma passed an amendment to the
Russian law on weapons prohibiting the circulation of ultrasound, infrasound and
electromagnetic equipment the parameters of which exceed the safety limits. In
2003 the Russian weekly Argumenty i Fakty published an interview with Sergei
Voroshilov, who initiated this amendment. He said " We are facing a new and
schocking situation: there exists a new type of criminality against which people
have no means of defence. Official power ignores this problem… until now there
was no section or office formed in the executive branch which would be
comissioned  to deal with this type of criminality."
     The same weekly, already in 1994, published an article describing the shooting
of a TV series on psychotronic weapons entitled "Black Box" (the shooting was
soon put to a stop). The journalist sat down in front of a psychotronic generator
and started describing his experiences "I can not see clearly any more. I can not
concentrate…something is stifling my brain…". The designer of the generator, the
doctor of medical sciences, Yakov Rudakov, told  the journalists that the
generator is capable to affect the hall full of people, that it can be used to make
people asleep or produce   hallucinations and that the method is called
"neurolinguistic programing". In another article on the same page of the weekly
was quoted a former deputy director of the enterprise working under military
contracts as saying that his enterprise produced an equipment capable to affect,
from the satelite, the psychophysical activity of the population of the whole region
of Krasnoyarsk.
     The weekly "Argumenty i Fakty" wrote that in the next part of the TV shooting
the journalist, who volunteered for the experiment, was supposed to be subjected
to "coding". This meant that into his brain an activity should be programed which
he would perform when he hears an unusual word connection like "blue
camomile". As an example of what he could do the weekly wrote that he could
jump out of the window. Though the result of this experiment was not published,
in Russia was this method recalled after the death of general Rokhlin, who in
1998, several weeks before his death, on several occasions repeated that there
exist signs that there is being prepared an assault on his life. He even visited the
editor's office of the  weekly "Argumenty i Fakty" and during the visit he
described the possible scenario of the assassination. He said "either they will
arrange for a car accident or  everything will look like a result of a drunken spree
or as a result of a family dispute". General Rokhlin, who planed to organize army
protests against the army reform, was shot by his wife. Before a murder she had a
quiete phone conversation with her girlfriend (Argumenty i Fakty, July 23, 1998
"Versii ubijstva generala Rokhlina").
     In the quoted article by Komsomolskaya Pravda it was stated that the subject
of "the effects of microwave radiation on human behavioral functions  (creation of
biorobots)" was placed on the "List of Information Baned from Publication" in the
year 1990 in Russia. In 2003 the weekly "Argumenty i Fakty" wrote: "Without
any doubt there exist technologies of physical and psychical oppression of human
being… but there is no chance to receive information on this subject from the first
hand" since it is "most highly calssified". It is clear that for as long as those
weapons remain classified they can be used no matter that their use is in conflict
with the constitutions of democratic countries. In this way a system of parallel
democracy is created where to some people the rights are denied which are
guaranteed to others. The statistics of people claiming that they are used for mind
control experimentation suggest that this holds true especially for the USA and
Russian Federation, both countries well known for their mind control research .
Mojmir Babacek
          According to Russian newspapers and some Russian politicians about
thirty countries in the present world are involved in mind control research
aiming at the possibility to control human being at distance by means of
manipulation of its nervous system by physical fields (in some cases the use of
implants have been proved). The survey of people complaining of manipulation
of their nervous system (below) proves that such people may be found in twenty,
technologically advanced, countries of the world (the countries which are not
presented in the statistics have no complaints of  nervous system manipulation
on internet discussions lists or by regular mail). What is striking is the fact that
the countries which are best known for mind control research - the Russian
Federation and the USA have as well the highest numbers of people claiming
remote manipulation of their nervous system. The number of such complaints in
Japan is also alarming.  We strongly recommend that the governments which
truly care for human freedom, human rights organisations, mass media and the
United Nations become aware of those facts and take the appropriate action.
Citizens and Initiatives for the Protection against Electrosmog (Germany)
Citizens Against Human Righst Abuse (USA) http://www.mindjustice.org
Citizens Association for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System by
Means of Radiofrequency Radiation (Czech Republic) http://web.iol.cz/webstranka.htm
Moscow Committee for the Ecology of Dwellings (Russian Federation)
CCAPT Collectif Contre les Abus Dues aux Psychotechnologies (France) 
Association Against Secret Experimentations on Humans (Switzerland -
Mind Control Victims Association of Japan  (Japan)
International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System
by Technical Means ( http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm )

Country   Population in millions   Number of people        Verification
      of inhabitants         claiming that they
    are victims of mind
         control experiments
Australia   20           10              [email protected]
Belgium   10    1                   [email protected] Brazil   174     0 
Bulgaria     7.5    0
Canada    25                      24              [email protected]
         [email protected]
China         1281     7   [email protected]
Czech Republic  10    3   [email protected]
Denmark    5.4    0
Estonia    1.4    0
Finland    5.2    3            [email protected]
France   60           50               [email protected]
Germany   82           20   [email protected]
Greece   10.6    0
Hungary   10    0
India       1050    1          [email protected]  
Ireland    3.9    0
Italy    58    7 (the count of visits of
website           dedicated  to this problem in one day http://www.aisjca -
mft.org )
Japan   127        138      [email protected]
Kazakhstan   16.8    0
Korea South  48.6    1 http://user.chollian.net/~antidew/         
[email protected]   
Mexico  104    1                 [email protected]
Netherlands   16    8                 [email protected]
New Zealand   4    2  [email protected]
Norway    4.5    0
Peru    29    0
Philippines   86    0
Poland   38    3  [email protected]
Portugal   10    0
Russian Federation144         400                (according to the Russian
       daily Komsomolskaya Pravda there might be much more: Komsomolskaya
Pravda, June 6, 1992, V. Umnov, "Kupite Ustroistvo dlia Slezki za sosediami")
[email protected]
Slovenia      2    2  [email protected]
South Africa   42    0
Spain     40     3
Sweden     9    4  [email protected]
Switzerland     7.4    3           [email protected]
Taiwan   22    1           [email protected]
Thailand   64    1  
Turkey   69    0
United Kingdom  60    31               [email protected]
                          [email protected]
United States 293    522             
[email protected]
       [email protected]  
       [email protected]
         [email protected]
Venezuela    25    1          [email protected]
Vietnam    82    0 



Email this article to a friend

To become a Member of Global Research

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global Research's News and Discussion Forum , at http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global Research (Canada) articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title of the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged as follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.caFor cross-postings, kindly use the active URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article. The author's copyright note must be displayed. (For articles from other news sources, check with the original copyright holder, where applicable.). For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

For media inquiries: [email protected]

© Copyright belongs to the author, 2004. For fair use only/ pour usage équitable seulement.